خرید ووچر خدمات تصحیح رایتینگ تافل New Format

قبل از استفاده از این سرویس باید وچر مربوط به خدمات تصحیح رایتینگ تافل را بایستی تهیه کنید.

پاسخ مربوط به سوال زیر را در یک فایل ورد بنویسید و در بخش مشخص شده آپلود نمایید.

سپس در بخش پرداخت وچر مشخص شده را برای تکمیل فرآیند انتخاب کنید.

پس از اتمام خرید، فایل شما برای تصحیح ارسال خواهد شد. و وضغیت سفارش به ارسال برای تصحیح تغییر خواهد کرد.

از طریق پنل کاربری خود بخش خدمات تصحیح فایل تصحیح شده بعد از حداکثر 6 روز کاری برای شما ارسال خواهد شد.

صورت سوال 

Q1  

Your professor is teaching a class on language learning.  Write a post responding to the professor’s question

In your response, you should do the following

Express and support your opinion •

Make a contribution to the discussion in your own words •

An effective response will contain at least 100 words 

Professor

Some experts think that it is more favorable for pupils to begin studying languages at primary school instead of secondary school. They argue that kids’ success in picking up their mother tongue can be repeated for their go at a second language. On the other hand, kids’ incomplete knowledge of their mother tongue and their preoccupation with school subject seems to suggest that such an endeavor had better begin later on in their high school time. If you had to choose between the two options, which one would choose? Why 

Alex

 The main reason to start kids off with foreign languages early is that this increases the likelihood they will achieve fluency in adulthood. That is to say that they will have far more years to perfect their skills, and speaking bilingually will seem perfectly normal. For example, in countries such as Holland and Norway, where English is taught from a very young age, most adults speak it at an advanced level 

Maggie

I think that children would be better off beginning learning a second language when they are at high school because they will learn it a lot quicker and can learn to speak at a much higher level because their cognitive abilities are advanced enough to allow them to absorb the rules of the new language and put them to use

Q2  

Your professor is teaching a class on environmental issues.  Write a post responding to the professor’s question

In your response, you should do the following

Express and support your opinion •

Make a contribution to the discussion in your own words •

.An effective response will contain at least 100 words 

Professor Martinez

It is sometimes argued a carbon tax as the best way to deal with climate change. Carbon taxes are a subspecies of tax; taxes that are designed primarily to change behaviors rather than to raise revenue. If you had to decide how to stop industries from polluting the environment, what would you do? Why

Daniel

The case for taxing industry is that it will discourage the worst practices of companies. This has been evidenced in the European Union where enterprises are taxed at higher rates, oftentimes depending on their relative carbon footprints. The result is that businesses are incentivized to adopt cleaner energy practices. The companies that are greener can therefore enjoy both the benefits of reduced taxes and the public opinion boost concomitant with eco-friendly initiatives 

:Emma

There are more positive policies that can encourage, rather than discourage, the corporate world. Taxation is a fundamentally reactive measure that supposes companies would not wish to inherently protect the planet. A more proactive approach would involve funding green industries. For example, companies such as Tesla have received billions in government subsidies to build stability for a green industry. Over time, more companies will be able to establish themselves and turn profits and there will be less of a need to use taxes to discourage industries from polluting

Q3  

Your professor is teaching a class on sociology.  Write a post responding to the professor’s question

In your response, you should do the following

Express and support your opinion •

Make a contribution to the discussion in your own words •

.An effective response will contain at least 100 words 

Doctor Achebe

Let’s think about population trends in urban and rural areas (villages). Living in urban areas can be expensive; nonetheless, when they have a choice of where to live, people in some countries do not wish to live in rural areas even if the cost of living there is lower. If governments of some countries want to attract more people to live in rural areas or villages, what is the best strategy or approach that governments can use? Why

Claire

I would live in a rural area if the government gave more financial help to farmers. Although it may cost very little to live in a rural area, it costs a lot to begin a career in agriculture. If I had financial help, I would start my own farm and be happy to live in a rural area

Kelly

In my country, urban centers are great places to live because you can access shops, restaurants, and museums. If the government of my country wanted to attract me to live in a rural area, the area would first have to attract more businesses focused on entertainment and culture than most rural areas have now

Q4  

Your professor is teaching a class on economics. Write a post responding to the professor’s questionIn your response, you should do the following

Express and support your opinion •

Make a contribution to the discussion in your own words •

An effective response will contain at least 100 words

Doctor Achebe

In 1930, a famous economist predicted that at the end of the twentieth century, an average worker would work only 15 hours a week, thanks to advances in technology. This did not happen, as we all know. Nonetheless, the balance between work time and free time remains an interesting question. So, let me ask you today: Twenty years in the future, will people have more leisure time (free time) and less work than they have today? Why, or why not

Claire

I think it is likely that people will work shorter hours in twenty years than they do today. Our societies are becoming wealthier all the time. It does not seem necessary for people to continue working as hard as they do today. At some point, having more free time should be more important than creating more wealth

Paul

I am not sure people will work less in the future. As Doctor Achebe wrote, a shortening of the workweek was predicted before. There are many factors that determine how long people work. Our economic system is very competitive. Workers are pushed to work longer and longer hours so that companies have a competitive advantage.

Q5 

Your professor is teaching a class on economics. Write a post responding to the professor’s question

.In your response, you should do the following

Express and support your opinion •

.Make a contribution to the discussion in your own words •

An effective response will contain at least 100 words

Professor

These days more and more students are bringing cellphones to class. Even elementary school aged students have cellphones in their pockets and backpacks. Now here’s a quick question to discuss: “Should cellphones be allowed in classrooms

Maria

I approve of using them due to the pros which it provides. To illustrate, cellphones give students access to tools and apps that can help them complete and stay on top of their class work. Teachers can also take advantage of cellphones by providing students with resources to find more information about a topic. This can include videos, new stories, online discussion groups, etc

Anna

While cellphones can be used as learning tools, it is a challenge to make sure students are using them for school-related tasks. Therefore, we should consider the cons as well. When students use their cellphones to check social media and text their friends in class, it leads to distractions for those students and their peers. Cellphones can be a helpful learning tool in class, but they also easily distract the students in class.

Q6

Your professor is teaching a class on economics. Write a post responding to the professor’s question

In your response, you should do the following

Express and support your opinion •

.Make a contribution to the discussion in your own words •

An effective response will contain at least 100 words

Doctor Diaz

Our current unit looks at tourism and the benefit it has on a country’s economy. Many argue that while tourism can indeed be a money-making endeavor, it can do more harm than good, especially tourism to small, remote places that are not heavily populated. What is your opinion? Should local or national governments promote tourism to remote regions not typically visited by tourists before? Why ?

Andrew

Tourism has always been a lucrative business. Improving the economies of these rural regions, especially if those regions are poor, can only have a positive effect. People can have a better quality of life by showcasing their food and traditions to the outside world. It’s a chance the people might not get without promotion from the government.

Claire

I don’t think governments should promote tourism to remote regions. The people are likely not asking for this kind of industry or for this kind of attention. Instead, governments should develop other means of improving a region’s economic situation, like expanding agriculture or other industries. These efforts will have a stronger, more permanent impact on the region than bringing in groups of tourists

Q7

Your professor is teaching a class on economics. Write a post responding to the professor’s question

In your response, you should do the following

Express and support your opinion •

Make a contribution to the discussion in your own words •

An effective response will contain at least 100 words

Doctor Achebe

In 1930, a famous economist predicted that at the end of the twentieth century, an average worker would work only 15 hours a week, thanks to advances in technology. This did not happen, as we all know. Nonetheless, the balance between work time and free time remains an interesting question. So, let me ask you today: Twenty years in the future, will people have more leisure time (free time) and less work than they have today? Why, or why not?

Claire

I think it is likely that people will work shorter hours in twenty years than they do today. Our societies are becoming wealthier all the time. It does not seem necessary for people to continue working as hard as they do today. At some point, having more free time should be more important than creating more wealth.

Paul

I am not sure people will work less in the future. As Doctor Achebe wrote, a shortening of the workweek was predicted before. There are many factors that determine how long people work. Our economic system is very competitive. Workers are pushed to work longer and longer hours so that companies have a competitive advantage